Election day is 7 November 2026— Your informed vote matters. Learn more

All Topics

Transport

Policies on roads, public transport, and infrastructure.

Source: Official party websites. All summaries are factual descriptions of stated positions — Policy Compass does not endorse any party or position.
ACT

ACT's Transport Policy

ACT strongly supports road investment funded by road user charges, opposes subsidised public transport, supports highway expansions and new motorways, and argues the market should determine transport choices without government favouring one mode over another.

In simple terms

Build more roads funded by the people who use them, reduce public transport subsidies, and let people choose how they want to travel without government interference.

Impact to New Zealanders

Year 1–2

Road construction booms in profitable urban corridors; rural and provincial towns see minimal investment despite user-pays funding model.

Year 3–5

Public transport ridership drops as services shrink, forcing car-dependent workers to spend more on fuel while congestion worsens on new roads.

Year 10+

Low-income households unable to afford car ownership become geographically trapped; wealthy areas enjoy better mobility, widening regional economic inequality permanently.

GRN

Green Party's Transport Policy

The Green Party supports free public transport, rapid decarbonisation of the vehicle fleet, investing in cycling and walking infrastructure, cancelling new road projects in favour of public transport, and transitioning freight to rail.

In simple terms

Make all public transport free, build better cycling and walking paths, stop building new roads, and move freight from trucks to trains.

Impact to New Zealanders

Year 1–2

Government spending on free transport increases taxes or reduces funding for hospitals, schools; commuters save money immediately.

Year 3–5

Rural areas struggle with poor public transport while cities thrive; farmers and regional businesses face higher freight costs via trains.

Year 10+

House prices near transport hubs skyrocket as demand surges; lower-income earners priced out despite 'free' travel.

LAB

Labour's Transport Policy

Labour funded Auckland light rail investigations, invested significantly in public transport including half-price fares, commenced electrification of the Wellington rail network, and introduced the New Zealand Upgrade Programme for roads and rail. They also supported mode shift away from cars.

In simple terms

Invest in light rail and public transport, keep public transport affordable, upgrade rail, and make it easier for people to get around without a car.

Impact to New Zealanders

Year 1–2

Government borrows heavily for construction; interest payments reduce funding for schools and hospitals elsewhere.

Year 3–5

Property prices near new light rail stations surge, pricing out renters; landlords gain, young first-home buyers lose affordability.

Year 10+

Rural and provincial towns lose economic activity as people move to well-connected cities; regional inequality widens significantly.

NAT

National's Transport Policy

National has reinstated road building as a government priority, reviving the Roads of National Significance programme. They have reduced public transport subsidies, axed the Auckland light rail project, and increased the fuel excise duty. They support road user charges for electric vehicles.

In simple terms

Build more roads as a national priority, focus transport spending on roads rather than light rail, and make electric vehicle owners contribute to road funding.

Impact to New Zealanders

Year 1–2

Road construction creates short-term jobs, but budgets diverted from rail maintenance mean existing trains become less reliable for commuters.

Year 3–5

More roads attract more driving; congestion returns as induced demand fills new capacity, while EV owners pay extra fees despite lower emissions than petrol cars.

Year 10+

City centers remain car-dependent, property values concentrate in drivable suburbs, and lower-income workers without cars face reduced job access and housing affordability.

NZF

NZ First's Transport Policy

NZ First supports regional roading investment, rail freight (particularly for Northland), maintaining regional airports, and ensuring rural communities have adequate transport links. They oppose cuts to regional transport infrastructure and support the free public transport for SuperGold card holders.

In simple terms

Invest in roads and rail for the regions, keep airports in regional areas, and maintain free public transport for superannuitants.

Impact to New Zealanders

Year 1–2

Government redirects urban transport funding to regions, forcing Auckland and Wellington councils to raise local rates on homeowners to maintain city bus networks.

Year 3–5

Free superannuitant fares reduce ticket revenue, forcing regional councils to cut off-peak bus routes that younger workers and students depend on to reach jobs.

Year 10+

Young people migrate to better-serviced cities for work, shrinking regional workforces and tax bases, making regional transport even harder to fund sustainably.

TPM

Te Pāti Māori's Transport Policy

Te Pāti Māori supports free public transport, investing in active transport in urban Māori communities, ensuring rural Māori communities have adequate transport access, and a Treaty-based approach to roading projects that affect Māori land.

In simple terms

Make public transport free, build cycling and walking paths in Māori communities, improve transport in rural areas, and consult Māori on roading projects through their land.

Impact to New Zealanders

Year 1–2

Free public transport increases demand sharply, requiring higher taxes or budget cuts elsewhere—schools and hospitals compete for same funding.

Year 3–5

Cycling paths in Māori areas attract younger residents and small businesses, but existing car-dependent communities face higher living costs if services consolidate.

Year 10+

Permanent consultation requirements on roading slow infrastructure projects, benefiting Māori land rights but potentially delaying rural economic development and emergency services.

Want to compare parties on this topic?